set for venous insufficiency treatment
Innovative
MOCA
device
supported by
clinical
evidence
Non-thermal
non-tumescent
technique
potentiates
foam
sclerotherapy
Flebogrif is an innovative patented catheter medical device for the endovenous mechanochemical ablation (MOCA) of superficial insufficient leg veins.

It is anon-thermal, non-tumescence technique reducing procedure time allowing treatment of the entire truncal vein even below knee (60 cm and 90 cm catheters available).

Five retractable cutting elements scratch the inside of the vein wall. Foamed sclerosant is then injected through the catheter.
Each device contains:

·        Flebogrif catheter 6F
·        18GNeedle
·        J-type guidewire
·        6Fintroducer sheath
·        Dilator·        2x 5 ml luer-lock syringes
·        Three-way tap

Two catheter lengths 60 cm and 90 cm. The catheter consists of two coaxially cooperating parts:

·        internal- designed to be a lumen for the guidewire and to deliver the foamedsclerosant;
·        external - with length markers every 1 cm(starting at 10 cm from the distal end).

Key points / Advantages

1.      One size adaptable to various vein diameters.
2.      No risk of thermal injury for below knee segments
3.      Whole GSV length treatment possible
4.      Ambulatory procedure
5.      No need for tumescence, so reduced operative time
6.      Over the wire system Low volume waste, no electronic waste
key papers
Published studies have included nearly 1000 patients so far treated with Flebogrif and are listed below [?link to references accordion]. As with the previous generation MOCA device, methodological details for optimal use still need to be established, especially sclerosant concentration. Many of the early papers were pilot studies but nevertheless reported helpful data. More significant publications are highlighted here.

Park andPark (2026) Korean retrospective cohort study of 61 patients (105 GSVs) treated with Flebogrif and 2% STS(Fibrovein), mean foam volume 17.70 ml ± 6.13 ml. Anatomical success was 95.3%at one year. http://dx.doi.org/10.37923/phle.2024.22.2.77

Alozai etal (2022) published a systematic review of the early published studies up to October2020. A pooled analysis of three trials with 12-month follow-up gave ananatomic success rate of 93.2% (95% CI 90.3% - 96.1%) based on the using Flebogrif to teat 289 patients. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsv.2021.05.010 Two of the included studies used 2%polidocanol as the sclerosant (equivalent to 1% STS) and one used 3%polidocanol.

Iłżecki etal (2021), one of the studies included in the Alozai systematic review, published the three year follow-up of a cohort 200 patients of GSVs and SSVs treated with Flebogrif and 3% polidocanol. Closure rates of 92% remained at one-, two- and three-year follow-up. Baseline VCSS and VAS scores dropped significantly in the first year and remained reduced right up to the three-year follow-up. http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/pr.2021.106880

Tawfik etal (2020), also included in the Alozai review, is a comparative study of endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) versus Flebogrif with 2% polidocanol (MOCA). In the trial 100patients were randomised to either treatment; 50 patients were treated in each group with the majority of affected veins being the GSV.  One patient had a recurrence in the EVLA group and two in the MOCA group equating to one year closure rates of 98% and 96%respectively. The MOCA group had a significantly shorter operative time (26.9 ±9.0 minutes) compared the EVLA group (46.9 ± 10.0 minutes) and shorter time to return to work of 3.8 (± 1.0) days compared to 8.0 (± 1.4) days for EVLA treatment. There were significantly fewer cases of phlebitis in the MOCA group compared to EVLA (0 vs 7). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsv.2019.10.025

Zubilewicz et al (2023) treated 200 patients with GSV incompetence using Flebogrif and 3% polidocanol. At 12 month follow-up, 180 patients were reviewed; 90% had a lack of reflux in the GSV. Complete GSV occlusion was observed in 82.78%, partial segmental occlusion was noted in 12.22% with whole vein reopening in 5% cases. Quality of life indices were significantly improved and 94% returned to normal activities with  two days post-procedure. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jvsv.2022.12.014

Ammollo etal (2020) reported the three month occlusion rates of 24 MOCA procedures on 23 patients’ GSVs using Flebogrif and either 1.5% POL or 3% POL foam. None of the 3% POL cases showed recanalization but two of the 14 cases treated with 1.5% POL showed evidence of recanalisaton within the first few centimetres of the SFJ. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32123682

Canata et al (2025) published a case series of five patients with venous ulcers (3 to 5 cm diameter) treated with Flebogrif and 3% POL. All patients had the truncal vein (GSV or SSV) treated from the level of the ankle below the perforator vein under or near the ulcer to the SFJ or SPJ. Ulcer healing occurred between 21 and 35 days. http://dx.doi.org/10.23736/S1593-232X.24.00640-4
get in touch
If you wish to contact us for sales or further question please use the details below:

01432 373535
orders@limbco.uk